Richard Oceguera | (212) 605-9378 | roceguera@corcoran.com | 660 Madison Avenue
Richard's Report
RSS
  Printer Friendly Version    E-Mail a friend
Subscribe
Williamsburg Rental -- New to Market
March 03, 2010 04:29 PM




  Printer Friendly Version    E-Mail a friend
Subscribe
Go West for Jobs and Recovering Real Estate Markets
March 03, 2010 12:42 PM
By Francesca Levy, Forbes.com
In these 10 metros, jobs are projected to grow and the housing crisis is stabilizing.
In recent weeks business in Washington, D.C. ground to a halt as record snowfalls pummeled the area and a sparring match over national health care reform hijacked the political conversation. But the nation's capital is getting something right: It is emerging from the recession better than any other major city in the country, according to research by Forbes.
Jobs in Washington are growing quickly, and in 2008 the city produced more in goods and services than almost anywhere in the country.
D.C. and nine other cities (among them: Boston, Los Angeles and a host of metros in Texas) are best surviving the downturn in part because they specialize in industries that are relatively insulated from economic volatility. Federal and state jobs all but guarantee the health of a local economy, and nowhere is there more government-related work than in Washington. The city has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country, at 6.2%, and its output amounts to $362.3 billion, more than three times the average for the country's largest cities.
It also saw a more modest slide in home sale prices than many other metros in late 2009. Cities where the recession's effects are lessening either never felt the full brunt of the housing crisis, or have proven resilient enough that demand is returning sooner than elsewhere in the country. These strong housing markets further enrich the local economy by feeding a host of secondary industries, like construction, lending and household services.
Uncle Sam as a Recession Shield
Government spending hasn't hurt Austin, Texas, either. It's the seat of state government and tied for No. 1 on our list of 10 cities best surviving the recession. Jobs have been lost nearly everywhere in the last three years, but between December 2007 and December 2009 the number of jobs in Austin rose by 0.98%; more than any of the other major cities we looked at. And by three years from now, jobs are expected to grow by 8.09%, the second-best job outlook on our list. Third on the list is Dallas, home to a thriving technology and energy sector, where jobs are projected to jump 7.19% in three years.
Behind the Numbers
To find the cities where the recession was easing, Forbes looked for a relatively low unemployment rate, using December 2009 figures, the most recent available, and the rate of job growth between December 2007 and December 2009, both from the Bureau of Labor statistics. We sought cities where economists expected that jobs would keep growing, based on the three-year job-growth forecast from Moody's ( MCO - news - people ) Economy.com; we also looked for metros with the highest positive change in median sale price for single-family homes between the third and fourth quarter of 2009, according to the National Association of Realtors. Finally, we factored in Metropolitan Gross Domestic Product--the dollar amount of goods and services produced within a metro area--provided for 2008, the most recent available, by Moody's.
Forbes ranked the 40 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas for which it had comprehensive data (that excludes Nashville, Tennn. and Detroit, Mich.) on all these measures, then averaged the rankings for a final score.
Good Fortune In The Lone Star State
If one state is a poster child for economic recovery, it's Texas, home to four of the 10 cities on our list. There's more to why Austin, Dallas, San Antonio and Houston are faring well than just the state's energy industry. The tech, government and education industries supplement the oil state's riches. As for housing, cities in Texas didn't see the same run-up in home prices and rampant speculation that led to the spectacular bubble burst elsewhere in the country.
"The housing market got lucky, if you want to look at it that way," says James P. Gaines, research economist at the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University. "We didn't have excessive overbuilding, so we don't have a big overhang of unsold new homes, and because Texas has among most affordable housing in the country, the demand sustained."
 
 





  Printer Friendly Version    E-Mail a friend
Subscribe
Will Congress Extend the Home Buyer Tax Credit?
February 23, 2010 06:14 PM
 

It’s that time of year again: time for lobbyists to convince Congress to extend the home buyer tax credit.

The National Association of Realtors and other industry groups are beginning to make the rounds on Capitol Hill to press their case, which goes something like this: We know you’ve extended the tax credit two times already, but the housing market is still fragile, the tax credit is working, and don’t forget– you’re up for re-election soon. In other words, do you really want to own the next leg down in home prices?

They’ll also make their case by reminding pols that a series of other market supports are being removed, the largest of which is the Federal Reserve’s purchases of $1.25 trillion in mortgage-backed securities that expires next month and has pushed mortgage rates to postwar lows for much of the past year. The Federal Housing Administration is also under pressure to pull back its lending, and more foreclosures could add to the housing inventory as borrowers fail to qualify for modifications.

Industry groups are also pushing the argument that the credit should be extended because it’s taking so long for banks to approve short sales, where lenders agree to a sale for less than the value of the mortgage.

To recap, Congress first passed a $7,500 tax credit in 2008 for first-time buyers, but that credit had to be repaid over 15 years. When it expired one year ago, Congress extended it, expanded it to $8,000, and said it wouldn’t have to be paid back. Just before that credit was to expire last December, Congress extended it again, until April 30 (sales contracts signed by April 30 have until June 30 to close). A new credit of $6,500 was created for current home-buyers. “There’s nothing more permanent in Washington than a temporary tax credit,” jokes Howard Glaser, a housing-industry consultant.

This time, the lobbyists certainly have their work cut out for them. For one, industry groups last time swore that the last tax credit extension would be, well, the last extension. To secure the deal, the lawmaker who shepherded that effort through Congress, Sen. Johnny Isakson (R., Ga.), made clear at the time that extending it again would be a nonstarter. (His spokeswoman says that he has no plans to offer any legislation extending the credit. “Part of the benefit of the tax credit is the urgency of it sunsetting,” said spokeswoman Sheridan Watson.)

Economists mostly agree that the tax credit has helped to goose demand and sell more homes, though there’s still considerable debate over just how many homes would have sold anyway.

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com, pushed to extend the tax credit last fall but says now it’s time to let it expire. “It’s worn out its benefit,” he says. “If you extend it again, it isn’t going to do much, and what you’re doing is providing a tax break to folks who bought anyway.”

While there’s still about 10 weeks before the current tax credit expires, that doesn’t leave much time for buyers looking to cash-in, notes Keith Gumbinger of HSH.com, a financial publisher. Home sales surged last October when it looked like the tax credit might expire for good, and then plunged in December, once it the credit had been extended.

Readers, is it time to let the tax credit walk off into the sunset?

Written by NickTimiraos for The Wall Street Journal





  Printer Friendly Version    E-Mail a friend
Subscribe
Pending Home Sales Up
February 08, 2010 10:14 AM

 

Pending Home Sales for December were up significantly from November's reading, and up a healthy 10.9% over December 2008, as homebuyers take advantage of today's low rates and tax incentives. And speaking of low home loan rates, the Federal Reserve purchased $12 billion in Mortgage Backed Securities last week, bringing the total to $1.173 trillion since the program began in January of 2009...which leaves just $77 billion in purchases to be made over the next eight weeks until the program ends on March 31st. While home loan rates improved very slightly during this volatile week - don't forget that when the Fed is done buying, home loan rates will be very susceptible to moving higher. Please reach out to me to discuss how you or someone you know might benefit from current low rates, or the Homebuyers Tax Credit. The clock is ticking on both these fronts - so why wait? You can reach me at richard.oceguera@corcoran.com.

(The above info provided by Harold Sokol of Manhattan Mortgage)





  Printer Friendly Version    E-Mail a friend
Subscribe
Home Supply Posts Modest Rise
February 04, 2010 04:12 PM
 

 

 

 

 

The number of homes listed for sale rose only modestly in many parts of the U.S. in January, contrary to the usual big increase during the month. (See data.)

Housing analysts have been expecting more for-sale signs to sprout as banks catch up on a huge backlog of unresolved foreclosure cases and start putting more foreclosed properties on the market. That would likely put more downward pressure on prices, which have been stabilizing at the lower end of the market. But there is little sign that the expected buildup in inventory is happening.

The supply of homes available for sale in 27 major metropolitan areas at the end of January was up just 2.87% from a month earlier, according to figures compiled by ZipRealty Inc., a real estate brokerage firm based in Emeryville, Calif. The ZipRealty data cover all single-family homes, condominiums and town houses listed on local multiple-listing services in metro areas where the firm operates.

Inventories typically rise sharply in January after the holiday lull in home shopping. Zelman & Associates, a research firm, says that nationwide listings increased an average of 8.7% in January from the prior month between 1982 and 2008.

Ivy Zelman, chief executive of the firm, said it was surprising that there was no jump in January. But she said colder-than-usual weather may have caused some sellers to delay listings and that others may be waiting for a stronger market.

Compared with the year-earlier month, the January inventory in the 27 metro areas was down 22%.

The Zip data don’t cover New York City. Miller Samuel Inc., an appraisal firm in New York, reports there were 7,344 cooperative apartments and condominiums on the market in Manhattan at the end of January. That was up 10% from a month before but down 19% from January 2009.

An estimated 7.5 million households are behind on their mortgage payments or in the foreclosure process. Many of those homes eventually will hit the market, but government efforts to avert foreclosures are slowing that process as banks try to figure out which borrowers might be saved by reduced monthly payments.

Home sellers this spring may benefit as buyers rush to qualify for federal tax credits on purchases. To qualify for those credits, buyers must sign purchase contracts by the end of April and complete the transactions by the end of June.

By James R. Hagerty
The Wall Street Journal Online

 





123456
Entries by Month

 Search
     




Powered by COTERIE®